Use case · Secure vibe coding

Every feature now starts as a prompt. Security has to start there too.

Vibe coding moves at the speed of a prompt. Reykur sits inside the agent loop and reviews every plan against your threat model before a single line of code is written.

❯Claude CodeOpenAI CodexCursor
Watch a session

Works with Claude Code · Codex · Cursor and other major coding agents

One real session

A flaw caught before the code is written.

One prompt, one plan, one interjection. The whole review happens inside the agent loop, in seconds.

agent session · billing-portalWaiting for promptAgent planningReykur reviewingPlan revisingApproved
Add SSO to the billing portalDrafting a plan…1. Add OIDC provider config2. Wire callback route3. Store session token, signed HS256
Reykur · 7 requirements from your threat model
CritSign session tokens with RS256, never HS256ASVS 3.5.2
HighValidate the OIDC state parameterASVS 51.2.1
HighBind the session cookie to SameSite and SecureASVS 3.4.1
+ 4 more, scoped to this task
Revising the plan…3. Store session token, signed RS2564. Set cookie SameSite=Strict; Secure5. Validate state + ID token issuer
Plan approved · 0 open requirements · the agent writes secure code from here
The same flaw, two lives

Caught in the plan, it costs ~30 seconds.

Caught in production, the same flaw means a rewrite, a second review and weeks of lost time. Sometimes worse.

Without a reviewer in the looptotal: ~4 weeks
Minute 0PromptAgent plans, HS256 flaw inside
Hour 2MergedFlaw is now code, tests pass
Day 1DeployedForgeable session tokens in prod
Week 3Pen-test findingCritical: auth bypass
Week 4Rewrite & re-reviewKey rotation, forced re-login, a week lost
With Reykur in the looptotal: + ~30 seconds
Minute 0PromptAgent plans, HS256 flaw inside
+ ~30 secondsReykur interjectsRequirement injected, plan corrected before any code
Hour 2Merged cleanRS256, state validated, cookies bound
Day 1Deployed ✓Nothing to find three weeks later
Not generic AI advice

Every requirement has a paper trail.

Nothing is invented in the moment. Each interjection traces from a threat in your model, through a deterministic control library, into the plan the agent executes.

Threat · your modelSession token forgeryFrom the living threat model Reykur keeps for your product.
Control · libraryASVS 3.5.2: asymmetric token signingCurated libraries built on OWASP ASVS, SOC 2 and more. 300+ requirements.
Requirement · in the plan“Sign session tokens with RS256”Risk-based mapping surfaces only what matters for this change. Seven, not 300+.
Shipped · on recordSecure and compliant, by designThe feature ships with every requirement addressed and the decision trail stored for audit.

How it fits the threat model

New product · no model yetThe plan becomes the first model.Components, data and boundaries are read out of the agent's plan into a first threat model, and the review runs against that from the very first prompt.
Existing product · new featureThe plan updates the model.Whatever the plan changes about the product, a new component, a new flow, a moved boundary, is written back into the threat model. The integration reads the model and enriches it. It never works from a stale copy.
For security teams

See the risks that matter, and skip the noise.

Every plan the team ships is stored and searchable: what was built, which risks it carried and how each one was mitigated. Posture you can measure.

Example: one team, one month
4critical flaws stopped before code
17high flaws stopped before code
312plans reviewed

Vibe coding is not the risk.Doing it without a threat model is.

Live in under 2 minutes: one token, one install. Your agents keep shipping while your threat model starts reviewing.

Get early access

Get early access

Be among the first to try Reykur and help shape continuous product security.

No spam. We'll only email you about Reykur.